A Call for Love: You Get Angry, I Get Curious
by Robert Meagher on 08/02/18
I used to avoid conflict. Sometimes I would go to great
effort to avoid conflict. Conflict was a very uncomfortable space and place for
me to be in, so I would often do whatever was needed to avoid it. This
avoidance could manifest in a variety of forms, but my two favorite ways to
avoid conflict were to either remove myself from the conflict or try and
placate the situation to calm the waters.
Removing myself from the perceived conflict would often
manifest as saying nothing and physically walking away from any perceived
conflict in progress. Another example is I would physically cross the street or
change my direction, chart a new course, if I perceived any form of conflict up
ahead. This was merely another symbolic form of removing myself from, or
avoiding, the perceived conflict.
Placating the situation to calm the waters was a favorite
strategy of mine to avoid conflict. Not only was I trying to avoid the
conflict, but I would get an egoic rush when I thought I had successfully stopped
someone else from fighting. I thought I was being successful and / or useful
when I stopped others from fighting. This was born out of my early childhood
conditioning to try and fix others and to make things better.
Conflict is still not the most comfortable environment for
me to be in. I certainly do not consciously seek out conflict. But I no longer
avoid conflict or conflictual situations. When my perception of conflict
arises, something quite different unfolds now.
Present in any conflictual situation I encounter, is anger.
I have come to recognize and observe two immutable laws of anger. First, I am
never angry at what I think I am. Second, anger is simply my ego’s way of
trying to make someone else feel guilty for my own inner pain and grief. So
when dealing with anger, my first line of inquiry may always be: “What am I
really angry at?” and “What am I covering up?”
Anger is also my ego’s default mechanism for trying to control
people and situations. Think about it; when I get angry, I am trying to change
the outcome of whatever is being presented to me. My anger may be a way of
trying to overpower, distract, persuade, manipulate, or change another person
or situation—all thinly veiled attempts to control other people and other
situations.
Ultimately my anger, as a tool for control, is my window and
mirror on my fears. What is it I am trying to control exactly? Someone else? A
situation? Why can I not accept someone as they are? Why can I not accept a
situation as it is? Why do I need to control others and other situations? Very
simply, because I fear losing control. I fear the feeling of not being in control. I fear letting go. I fear
not knowing. I fear the unknown. I fear my own demise. I fear my death.
So when I am present in a conflictual situation, of which
anger is rooted, I am aware that whatever seems to be the source of my anger is
not the real source of my anger; I am merely projecting my anger out on to whatever
is presenting itself to me. And I am aware that I am merely trying to get rid
of my anger and avoid taking responsibility for what it is I am
experiencing—thinking, seeing, doing, and feeling.
This awareness allows me to start to get curious. What is at
the root of the anger? What is this person (myself perhaps) trying to project?
What is this person trying to get rid of? The inquiry allows me to create some
space between the situation, the events, and my response to it. This is as
natural to do as when I observe others in conflictual situations, as it is when
someone appears to be angry at me or when I am tempted to be angry at someone
else.
On a deeper, spiritual level, perhaps, I know that I am only
ever being shown love or a ‘call for love.’ A ‘call for love’ may come in many
different forms. But it’s all the same ‘call.’ Conflict and anger are very
common forms of ‘a call for love.’ So when I receive a ‘call for love,’ I know
there is something for me to learn. Again, I get curious.
These ‘calls for love’ are a wonderful opportunity to learn
about the person calling out. But I know, ultimately, that there is only ever
an opportunity to learn about myself. The person I am seemingly angry at, or
who is angry at me, is merely reflecting back to me my own anger and my own
attempts to avoid looking at myself. The ‘other’ is only ever ‘me’ and the
other is showing me what it is I am angry at.
So when someone else gets angry, I get curious. It is the only way to heal my separated mind. For in the awareness that the other is merely a reflection of me, I see the other in me and myself in the other—I am given an opportunity to experience oneness.